I Have Immunity!

 

There is a fantastic campaign underway right now that makes a strong, powerful, and potentially life-saving statement.

 

 

I Have Immunity

 

One of its main objectives is to raise awareness of just how valuable and life-saving vaccines are.  It is only because of vaccines that diseases like measles, whooping cough, diphtheria, and polio have been controlled and almost completely eradicated from our population.  So effective are these control measures, that when these conditions do arise, they are often unrecognized and misdiagnosed, resulting in fatal consequence. 

 

Thanks to vaccines, the majority of doctors today have never seen, first hand, the symptoms of the above conditions.  They have no memory of the rash and fever that accompanies measles.  The fever and cough of pertussis are often unrecognized and attributed to a flu or a cold.

 

In the last few years, things have begun to take a turn for the worse though.  Thanks to outspoken and uneducated anti-vaccine advocates like Jenny McCarthy and Jim Carrey, (and of course we can’t forget Oprah for providing them an international platform), vaccine rates are now on the decline.  Inaccurate tales based on misinformation and fear are spread irresponsibly, and have no basis in truth. Without proper scientific studies and/or data, these spokespeople site vaccines as the cause of autism. 

 

 

 

When presented with evidence to the contrary, they change the goal posts, finding other ways to demonize vaccines and those who support their use.  They continue to wrongly accuse vaccines of hurting and killing children.  Millions of people world-wide have been scared into believing that vaccines are harmful and may cause a child autism, and that is just not true! Vaccines do not cause autism!  They just don’t!

 

So, as a result, doctors today are again becoming familiar with diseases long thought to be eliminated from wealthy, First World nations.  They are witnessing the suffering and sometimes deadly consequence of avoidable disease, often in the youngest and/or weakest in our population.  Babies who are too young to vaccinate, or cancer patients with compromised immune systems who depend on herd immunity are the innocent victims. 

 

All parents want to act in the best interest of their child.  The “motherly instinct” line of defense is often used when no other logic, reason, or scientific evidence is available to support a decision. 

 

I too am a mom, and like any other mom, I do depend on my “motherly instinct” as well.  I use it when I need to comfort my child when she wakes in the night from a bad dream.  I use it when she grieves over a lost toy.  In these cases I find it perfectly acceptable to defend my actions and go with the “Mother-knows-best” defense. 

 

As I said, I am just a mom.  I am not a doctor, a health care adviser, or even a qualified first aid attendant for that matter.  So when it comes to issues of healthcare and disease prevention, my “motherly instinct” tells me to consult a professional who knows more than I do. 

 

Given the fact that my family is fortunate enough to live in one of the wealthiest countries in the world, which also happens to have one of the finest health-care systems in the world, why would I rely on the advice of someone who has no medical experience whatsoever.  Honestly, why would I think that even I could make a better medical judgment than my doctor? Why would I think that Jenny McCarthy, Jim Carrey, or Oprah Winfrey knows what’s best for my child? 

 

Parental instinct does not mean you have to have all the answers.  Why would doctors and scientists study to find new answers if we already had all of the solutions to begin with?

 

Parental instinct ≠ knowing everything!

 

Parental instinct does mean that it is in our nature to protect our children from harm.  It is in our nature to do everything possible to ensure the happiness and success of our children.  There is an innate desire to help our children live a productive life.  And so, we depend on professionals daily to provide our kids advantages towards success.  We rely on teachers to educate and coaches to skill build.  We rely on the engineer who designed the safety support structures that keep our children’s schools standing.  These may be areas that we are not experts in so we take the advice of trained professionals who are educated in their field.

 

When it comes to matters of life saving vaccines, why on earth would we ever rely on the medical advice of an actor or a Playboy model? 

 

Parental responsibility = asking for help

 

It does seem that some of the more outspoken anti-vax celebs and spokes people have backed down from the TV rounds lately.  Perhaps the high profile exposure of Andrew Wakefield’s fraud has driven some away.  But unfortunately they haven’t vanished completely, and the message that vaccines are harmful and cause autism continues to spread.  Much damage has been done.  Vaccination rates have declined and we are globally and rapidly feeling the effects.

 

However, even though we seem to be hearing about new outbreaks of measles and pertussis almost daily, it is not too late to turn the tides.

 

As parents, teachers, adults, children, citizens of the world, we need to come out in crowds to support vaccines and their life-saving effects and say yes… “I Have Immunity!  Do you?”  Let’s be open to discussing this, as if it’s not a taboo topic.  Let’s question the other mom’s on the playground, rationally, to ask why they believe what they do regarding the safety of vaccines.  We don’t have to have all of the answers, but if we can at least provide them with a link or a reference to reliable vaccine education, it may encourage them to open their minds and investigate further.  We are so often politically correct in allowing everyone to have their personal opinions and feelings, but in this case, a granted right to vaccine exemption based on personal belief is coming at a huge cost.  Not just in money but in our children’s and family’s lives.

 

Thousands of people turn out every year at Autism conferences worldwide.  They are scared and in most cases, they are sure that vaccines are to blame for their children’s condition.  Shouldn’t the fear of disease outbreaks, iron lungs, and infants dying from the sheer exhaustion of a cough at least compel a few of us to come forward as well?  The consequence of vaccination decline frightens me, and I am ready to do something about it!

 

Don’t think you can’t make a difference?

 

It only took a couple of unvaccinated travelers to cause the recent Quebec measles outbreak where over 250 people were infected.  It only took one Swiss traveler to initiate a 2008 measles outbreak in Arizona which infected fourteen people, involved two hospitals and cost almost $800,000.  Maybe it will take only one child in your kid’s school to begin the next epidemic. 

 

Now consider this…Maybe it will only take one parent to begin the local discussion and encourage vaccines.  Maybe you will be the one teacher or student to challenge the anti-vaccine movement and increase herd immunity. 

 

It is our privilege to live in country that has access to excellent health care and vaccines, and it is our social and global responsibility to promote vaccines and protect those who cannot be vaccinated.  Every person vaccinated is a win for health…world wide!

 

It’s not too late to tip the scales. 

 

Stand up and be proud to shout “I Have Immunity!”

 

 

 

Posted in Anti-Vax, Health | 1 Comment

Parenting Under the Stars

Parents today face so many more issues with raising kids than in any previous generation.  What will be the impact on your child’s language skills if your do or don’t teach your baby sign language?  How do we teach our kids to be safe on the internet and social networking platforms?  Do we go with a Montessori or play-based pre-school?  What truths or misinformation exist behind the anti-vaccination movement?  There is no end to the list of important issues we deal with today – urgent issues that ten years ago, we could not have possibly prepared for, or even imagined. 

 

It truly begs the question of why a parenting magazine would choose to devote an entire page to the topic of children and horoscopes.  With no shortage of urgent and important issues available for discussion, why promote astrology?

 

 

BC Parent Magazine is self described as:

 

“…the Lower Mainland’s original and most trusted resource for local families. Parents and caregivers have come to rely on BC Parent Newsmagazine for relevant, up-to-date information they can trust.”

 

In their most recent issue, titled Camp Issue 2011”, there is a full page “article” titled “Your Childs Horoscope”.  Now I use the term “article” loosely, because it really comes across as more of a paid advertisement.  The author, Debra Silverman, is in the business of astrology, and all of the peripherals that tag along with that.  Yes, for just $250-$300 per hour you too can have your own personal reading.  The BC Parent Magazine article ends with Debora’s contact information, just in case you’re interested in a reading for your child, yourself and your family.

 

The writing in this issue specifically addresses “How to parent your Pisces or Aries child”. 

 

This is pure pseudoscience masquerading as parenting advice! 

 

I mean really, you’re telling me that I should utilize one parenting method if my child was born on March 20 and was a Pisces, instead of being born March 21, making her an Aries?  What if she had been due March 25, but I had a planned C-Section March 15; have I messed with the stars’ plans for that baby?  Under the astrological parenting advice guidelines, which methods would I then employ?

 

According to the advice given, Pisces children “…don’t want any reprimands or to have to be corrected in public”.  The Aries child, however, is described with the following attribute “..Luckily, they take criticism easily..”.  If you were in fact parenting based on astrological advice, and you got those two qualities confused, you could really mess up. 

 

The majority of people would argue that astrology is just for fun…what’s the harm?  I am personally shunned often in the lunch room when someone is reading the newspaper, advising others the destiny of their day.  “Oh, don’t take things so seriously” and “It’s just for fun, lighten up” are common statements that I hear. 

 

What needs to be remembered is that astrology is more than just a corner piece in the newspaper.  It is a huge industry that brings in estimates of hundreds of millions of dollars every year, just in the United States alone.  (That’s a serious investment for a country whose economy has just gone through its worst decade since the 1930s.*)  It’s also an industry based on total inaccuracy and make-believe. 

 

There are a lot of people who believe this astrological advice wholeheartedly, and they do much more than just read the newspaper horoscope.  They are highly influenced by it and spend enormous amounts of money on it.  Any encouragement of this, especially when presented in an authoritative and advisory manner, is negligent.  Any publication that presents this information as parenting advice is making a clear statement about the integrity of their brand.   

 

BC Parent Magazine also claims:  

“BC Parent goes beyond recipes and crafts to give parents the information they want on health care, education, birthing, the arts, community events and so much more. From pregnancy through teens, BC Parent Newsmagazine provides in-depth articles and information for all families.”

Well, in the department of providing in-depth articles and relevant information we can trust, I’m not convinced.  A parenting magazine publishing advice in the form of an article (not an ad) on how to parent your child depending on when he or she was born is just irresponsible and not at all trustworthy, relevant or informative. 

 

BC Parent Magazine, stick to your mission statement!  If you want to be taken seriously then publish serious, relevant information that is backed by studies and research.  If you are going to publish horoscopes, then don’t make claims of going beyond recipes and crafts to give parents information on health care and education. 

 

I understand that advertising is what keeps a freebie magazine going, but don’t underestimate your audience.  If you want highly respected, worthwhile advertisers to keep your publication going, then cater to an audience that really cares about child-care and education based that individual child’s needs and personalities, and not his or her birth date. 

Posted in Astrology, Pseudoscience | Leave a comment

CBS to run Anti-Vaccine Ads

Thanks to Skepchick Elyse Anders for bringing this to our attention!

                  Change.org –> sign this petition to tell CBS not to support this ad!  

 

On April 28, CBS is planning to run an anti-vaccine ad on the JumboTron screen in New York’s Times Square.  The ad is sponsored by Mercola and the National Vaccine Information Center and is masquerading as a “PSA”, but is nothing of the sort.  It is an ad that will encourage the spread of misinformation and fear.  Their message warns that vaccine risks outweigh the benefits, and that vaccines are completely optional. 

 

Ask the seven kids in Minnesota what option they had when they were not given vaccines and are now hospitalized with measles (a result that is being attributed to Andrew Wakefield’s fraudulent autism study). Or perhaps, the twenty-three kids at a private school in VA that were not vaccinated and are now suffering with pertussis (whooping cough).  Were they given the option of vaccination, or were their parents victims of continued fear-mongering about the dangers of vaccines.  What about the ten infants who died from whopping cough last year in California.  What options did they have?

 

There is no doubt about this, vaccines save lives!  As vaccination rates drop, there will undoubtedly be a resurgence of diseases like whooping cough, measles, and polio.  These are not diseases of the past. 

 

This video will be seen by thousands and thousands of people.  It must be stopped! 

 

 I urge you to sign Elyse’s petition, and email CBS.  Tell them this is unacceptable, irresponsible, and completely negligent!  They have a social responsibility to not spread misinformation and fear.  If these ads do run, CBS will have contributed directly to the ill-health of children worldwide.

 

Here’s the to-do list:

 

·          Sign the petition to stop the airing of the ad. 

·          Email CBS to let them know how you feel about the

·          Tweet @CBSOutdoor (#VaxCBS) to send them your message

·          Get the message out wherever you can!

 

Posted in Anti-Vax, Health | Leave a comment

WiFi stays in schools (for now)

Another update on the WiFi Woo…. 

 

In mid-March we contacted the local school board directly.  Inquiring further about their potential plans to remove WiFi from any or all of the local schools, we received the following response; 

 

Ms Melanie Stoiber, 

 

Thank you for your letter concerning WiFi. The board is not considering

removal of WiFi from  our schools. We believe it’s a matter for higher

levels of government and have sent the following message in a letter to

Health Canada;  

 

At the March 9, 2011 Public Board Meeting, the Board of Education (the “Board”)
passed the following motion: 

 

“THAT the Board contact Provincial and Federal health authorities to report local
incidents around Wi-Fi and attempt to seek counsel and how to proceed in resolving this.” 

 

The Board has received a presentation from members of the public on their concerns
around the use of Wi-Fi systems. The School District entirely
operates under the
Health Canada guidelines and regulations for the use of W
i-Fi systems, but through
this letter is requesting your assistance in dealing with any community issues around
the use of same. We would appreciate
your input and feedback on an agreed procedure
to report and deal with local incidents. We look forward to your response and assistance
in dealing with
this matter.”

 

The upside…WiFi will remain in the schools (for now), and that’s what we originally wanted.  We are thankful to have a School Board that will not make decisions based on emotional and anecdotal evidence.  It is both respectable and appropriate that the board members look elsewhere for advice in areas outside of their expertise, whatever the subject. 

 

The downside…The groups that are pushing for WiFi free schools are not going away.  In addition to showcasing poor science and improper studies to the local School Boards and Parent Advisory Councils, they are lobbying for a Federal reporting system to track the incidents of WiFi-attributed illnesses. Valuable time and resources are being wasted at so many levels.

 

The plan…While these fear-mongering groups are not going anywhere, neither are we.  Just as they will continue to sell their opinions and stories to concerned parents and citizens, we will be there to present the facts and the science.  No, we are not scientists, nor do we claim any trained scientific background.  We are parents who understand the scientific method.  We are citizens who understand the worth of scientific consensus.  Since we too know better than to act expertly fields that we are not technically trained, we have garnered the continued support of CFI, CASS, and a group of their advisors.  Together, we will ensure that the side of good science continues to be represented at these forums.    

 

The following links are highly recommended for further reading on this subject:

 

http://www.skepticnorth.com/2010/08/ontarioswifi-phobia-2/

 

http://www.skepticnorth.com/2010/08/further-down-the-wifi-rabbit-hole-i-go/

 

http://theness.com/neurologicablog/?p=2215

Posted in WiFi | Leave a comment

CITR Radio Freethinker discusses WiFi Hysteria

On the March 15, 2011 episode of Radio Freethinker (episode 106) we were fortunate to have the chance to discuss the ongoing issue of the WiFi Hysteria that’s occuring in Maple Ridge. 

Our thanks go out to Ethan Clow in particular for contacting us and giving us the opportunity to discuss this issue.

The interview only portion can be heard here:

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Alternatively, the entire episode can be downloaded here.  Great show for anyone interested in, or involved in the Skeptical movement.  If you view things with reason, science, and critical thinking then check it out!

Posted in WiFi | Leave a comment

Wi-Fi woo comes to Maple Ridge

Let’s be perfectly clear. This meeting was expected to be a well executed lecture period for the Anti-Wi-Fi movement. One-sided emotionally charged newspaper articles were injected into local papers in preparation for the agenda, each larger than the previous. The original panel of speakers was gathered to lecture their pseudoscience to the receptive crowd at the Senior Centre in Maple Ridge, British Columbia. I contacted the MLA and asked why the panel was so one-sided. His response was that he was unable to find anyone willing to speak on the side of science. FOR SHAME! Next time try a bit harder – hosting a forum about wireless technology and cell phone towers with a complete lack of science is nothing short of a witch hunt.

 

We contacted the Center for Inquiry Vancouver and Director, Jamie Williams stepped up. On the side of Science, Jamie was able to schedule Dr. Rob Tarzwell – Psychiatrist and Student of Nuclear Medicine. As well, after some negotiations with Michael Sather’s office, we were permitted a 5 minutes presentation from Melanie Stoiber – Co-founder of Skepparents.org. The scale was still completely unbalanced but at least now we had a couple of weights on our side. The count was six for banning Wi-Fi and two for not – or 37 minutes of “woo” and 20 minutes of science.

Here’s a quick intro to the panel left to right;

Farren Landers; Electro Pollution Consultant.     This clip shows him selling what appears to be a magic “wand” (no joke) that measures the energetic health status of each meridian in the body http://www.gogvo.com/evp/video/30201/Energy-health 

Liz Walker – A mother taking the stand against installation of Cell towers on school rooftops, expressing a distrust of Doctors who provide inaccurate advice on dispensing Dimetapp for children.  

Dr. Samantha Boutet N.D.     She and husband, Marc are local Naturopathic Doctors offering dubious therapies which include; chelation and neural therapy (just to name a couple), and one that I had to look up; Craniosacral Therapy, defined as a gentle touch therapy detecting restrictions and imbalances. They claim  this therapy aids many ailments; anxiety, autism, birth trauma, brain and spinal cord injuries, central nervous system disorders, chronic ear infections, chronic fatigue, chronic neck and back pain, colic, hyperactivity, learning disabilities, migraines and headaches, temporomandibular joint syndrome (TMJ), post-traumatic stress disorder, scoliosis, stress and tension-related problems. All are offered by a massage therapist and can be claimed with extended medical benefits.

Melanie Stoiber; Mother and Skeptic.     Co-founder of this Blog and Skepkids.org.

Margaret Johnston; Mother.     Local resident with the misfortune of having a tower installed on her property

Dr. Rob Tarzwell M.D.- Psychiatrist at UBC faculty of Medicine.  Currently studying Nuclear Medicine at UBC 

Curtis Bennett – Expert Electrician 

Una St. Clair Moniz – Director, Citizens for Safe Technology and hater of Wi-Fi.

Michael Sather MLA Ridge Meadows

Let recap; the original line-up was Melanie and Dennis Stoiber-local parents and recent CFI members vs. a room full of Woo. The venue permitted 60 seats but it didn’t take long before a temporary wall had to be moved to accommodate more.   Skeptics affiliated with the CFI Vancouver began arriving in groups including; Jamie, Brian, Fred, Patrick, Darcy, Joe, Gary, Michael, and Pat (I’m sure I’m forgetting someone but thanks!!). The average I.Q of the room actually increased (if you buy into the whole I.Q. thing). 

I won’t get into the details of the actual presentations here. I will try to acquire a video transcript.  (addendum – There will be a YouTube clip soon) As well, I’m not sure I have the qualifications or time to refute the whole transcript – here’s why; 

Una St. Clair Moniz from C.S.T. spoke fast and furious contradicting herself at least once and spewing out  amazing arrays of logical fallacies. I need a lot more practice before I can successfully refute a “Gish Gallop”. There was no doubt her presentation took a long time to prepare but I won’t say it was well prepared. It was the type of power point presentation that has been supplemented over years and never properly organized leaving a gnarly mess of dreadlocky stuff that hemorrhages crappy science. The research just wasn’t there and her evidence was convenient and cherry-picked. During Q & A there were shouts from the crowd to the song of, “That’s not Science!” and “Do you know anything about Science?!”(I may have been one of them).

Curtis Bennett- the Expert Electrician with a clear motive to sell his consulting services. His investment is in his own claim; there is an error or omission in Health Canada’s Safety Code 6 and is therefore,”illegal”. His pitch to Victoria School District 61 is cleverly written to avoid liability. I am currently looking over his sales pitch and would like to blog about it (and him) later as there are many concerns. He introduced himself as a government trained electrical professional, certified by provincial and national standards (last I checked – that was a “Journeyman”). His presentation continued with generic pictures of fuses, a forest fire, electrical boxes, other irrelevant stuff and even a thermograph image of a breast tumor. Yes, The Electrician diagnoses Cancer too. He relied on his testimony citing the dangers of combining Wi-Fi frequencies of about 2.4 GHz and the natural 6 to 8 Hz of humans. I remember reading something about the low frequencies associated with the Nikola Tesla tower (or Wardenclyffe Tower) The fear was that the low frequency of about 8 Hz would interfere with the natural frequency of humans (also about 8 Hz) ultimately permitting a user full functional control of huge populations with some RC unit – kind of cool sci-fi but completely irrational.

Thankfully there was a voice of sanity in Dr. Rob Tarzwell.  Offering a simple explanation accompanied by a diagram of the electromagnetic spectrum – visible light in the middle with equally spaced lines above and below that separated the frequencies by increased/decreased orders of magnitude (from Gamma in the high and Radio in the low). We’ve all seen versions of this diagram before and it was explained simply and accurately (later vindicated/confirmed by a Nuclear Physicist during Q & A). 

 Let’s not forget about the two mothers who spoke first.  Margaret Johnston and Melanie Stoiber.  Both were great speakers. Without Bias, Melanie stole the show with simple logic, and critical thinking! Here is a clip: (Dr Boutet claimed to have done hours of research and here is Melanie’s response. Let’s remember that Boutet is the Naturopathic Doctor that removed her child from school blaming EMH). 

So what Michael Sather could not do in 7 to 10 days (likely more), CFI Vancouver  accomplished in 48 hours – by  providing qualified speakers and Skeptical supporters.  Those that  market  Wi-Fi hysteria-woo now know we’re here to challenge their tactics and scrutinize their claims.  Similar events have recently been showcased in areas such as White Rock and Victoria BC as well as Grande Prairie, Alberta with no significant challenge. With support from CFI Vancouver and affiliates, this will no longer be the case.

I will be following up with Michael Sather regarding his impression of the meeting.

Special thanks to Steve Thoms of SkepticNorth for providing much information on this topic!.  http://www.skepticnorth.com/

 

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

CITR Radio Freethinker “WI-FI Poisoning”

Listen to the segment here.  Thanks Ethan and Don!

Wi-Fi Poisoning

and don’t forget to check out their website http://radiofreethinker.com/

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Update; Wi-Fi in our Schools

Here is an e-mail response from MLA Michael Sather,
“…You are right that the public event I’m hosting is not represented by both sides of the discussion.  I contacted Health Canada who declined to send a presenter.  They said that Industry Canada does participate in these kinds of public meetings.  I then contacted Industry Canada who also declined, saying they “didn’t think they could add much to the discussion.”  I  also requested Bell, Telus and Rogers send a speaker.  None have returned my calls.I have not formed the opinion that cell towers and Wi-fi are dangerous to humans.  However, I have seen enough information that I believe the subject needs to be discussed openly…”
I found it hard to believe that no one was willing to take on the Wi-fi conspirators. We needed a “shout-out” to the Skeptic Community for advice and support. So as a serious weapon of educational enlightenment to the numerous villains of Wi-Fi Hysteria, we sent out the Bat-Signal.
We began by contacting the Rogues at  SGU, then The CFI in Vancouver and Fred Bremmer, and lastly Elyse Anders.  (check out the links) When These legendary Skeptics started responding, Melanie and I got excited but it didn’t stop there.  E-mails and phone calls “snowballed” supporting our cause and offering advice.  Other people we would like to thank are; Steve Thoms, Ian at Canadian Atheist, Ethen Clow, Dr. Aaron Gulliver, Ian Bushfield, Jan Unwin, MLA Michael Sather and especially Jamie Williams for all the support (more links to come – just have to get caught-up).  What an amazing community of people!!!
Back to business; With help from Jamie Williams and the CFI, the next step is to secure a speaker for the purpose of supporting the science behind the Wi-Fi hysteria. The office of the MLA seems responsive. If anyone out there would like to help, please contact us. Half the meeting is scheduled for Q and A.
EVENT DETAILS:
MARCH 9, 2011
RIDGE MEADOWS SENIORS CENTRE, ROOM A
12150 – 224 Street
MAPLE RIDGE
7:00 – 9:00 PM
I will update as events happen.
Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Wi-Fi in our Schools

It’s hard to think of a more passionate subject than the health of our precious children and when someone warns us of a potential safety risk, we listen.  Unfortunately, this passion is can be used as fuel for the propagation of fear and the recruitment of parents to support the hysteria of the misinformed.  Local MLA here in Maple Ridge, British Columbia, Michael Sather is hosting a meeting that includes speakers with the agenda to remove or prevent WI-FI in our schools.

 

 Speakers include a homeowner who has had to live beside two towers, a consultant (consultant of what? – I don’t know) and a representative from Citizens for Safe Technology. The CST web site is a patchwork of blatant fear mongering, mixed with conspiracy that includes heart warming pictures of children and nature. Their logo is a representation of radio waves spreading from a source with a big red circle and “strike-through”. I question whether the panel of speakers is a well balanced representation of the issues or at very least, scientifically educated to produce a balanced argument.

 

There is no doubt that the majority of supporters are genuine in their principles but misguided in their logic.  It is just about impossible to prove radio frequencies are totally harmless (just as it is impossible to prove anything is totally harmless) but the burden of proof is on those that make the claim of harm and here is why: No reliable double blind study has proven harm.

 

That is not to say there have not been studies – There have. We have seen many times before, studies that follow proper scientific methods eliminate biases and improper procedures.  Beware of studies that are not double-blinded. I watched a particularly pathetic attempt at a study on the show, 16:9 that had a patient with an accelerated heart condition claimed due to EMF. He had a loosely placed towel on his eyes and the doctor was not blinded at all. To the average person, this would be convincing evidence but in reality it equates to nothing. For kicks, Wiki Clever Hans Effect and Double Blind Study (It is essential that you arm yourself with these tools)

 

 

Hazardous symptoms of EMF-causing WI-FI are non specific, anecdotal and so far, nothing more than implausible (bad science!). A more likely explanation is fatigue, stress or caffeine intake/withdraw. Hard to imagine a teen that doesn’t want to go to school occasionally. However, some of these symptoms may be real and blaming Wi-Fi for harmful impacts may actually do a disservice to the ailing child; potentially discounting the true cause.

 

I conclude by urging you, Michael Sather, to continue caring for the health and wellbeing of our children. Our oldest will be entering the school system in September. Don’t take a step backwards by removing this valuable educational resource from our children. Our children have questions that need answering and information access is vital. Don’t suppress their education by removing these tools based on bad science and the impassioned arguments by the misguided. Use logic, reason and critical thinking when addressing issues that concern the education of our/my children.

 

If you want to reach Michael Sather, send your comments to michael.sather.mla@leg.bc.ca Or 250 387-3655

 

 

 

References;

 

Dr Ben Goldacre;

http://www.badscience.net/2007/06/bmj-column-why-dont-journalists-mention-the-data/

http://www.badscience.net/2006/05/attack-of-the-killer-kettles/

 

Dr Lorne Trottier

http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/?p=9407

http://www.emfandhealth.com/

 

Dr Steven Novella

SGU Podcast #266 edited for relevance WIFI radio quality

SGU Full podcast #266 for context  http://hw.libsyn.com/p/8/9/9/899247d11a85ba58/skepticast2010-08-19.mp3?sid=f99c66556fb6c545a24c96a8f03ae954&l_sid=19482&l_eid=&l_mid=1979881

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment